fries.wtf
Home Compare Honey Pepper Pimento Sandwich w/ Chick-fil-A® Filet vs Turkey & Ham Protein Pocket

Honey Pepper Pimento Sandwich w/ Chick-fil-A® Filet vs Turkey & Ham Protein Pocket

Chick-fil-A vs Subway · calories, protein, price & value compared

On overall value, Subway Turkey & Ham Protein Pocket wins — value score 77 vs 65.
For the most protein per dollar, go Subway Turkey & Ham Protein Pocket (5.3g vs 4.3g per $).
Pure protein: Chick-fil-A Honey Pepper Pimento Sandwich w/ Chick-fil-A® Filet has more (34g vs 21g).
Lighter option: Subway Turkey & Ham Protein Pocket (320 vs 600 cal).

Honey Pepper Pimento Sandwich w/ Chick-fil-A® Filet

Calories600
Total Fat30 g
  Saturated Fat9 g
Sodium1,680 mg
Total Carbs53 g
  Fiber1 g
  Sugars16 g
Protein34 g

Turkey & Ham Protein Pocket

Calories320
Total Fat11 g
  Saturated Fat4 g
Sodium1,260 mg
Total Carbs31 g
  Fiber2 g
  Sugars4 g
Protein21 g
MetricHoney Pepper Pimento Sandwich w/ Chick-fil-A® FiletTurkey & Ham Protein Pocket
Price $7.92 $3.99 ✓
Calories 600 320
Protein 34g ✓ 21g
Carbs 53g 31g
Fat 30g 11g
Protein / $ 4.3g 5.3g ✓
Calories / $ 76 80 ✓
Protein / 100 cal 5.7g 6.6g ✓
Health score 58 73 ✓
Value score 65 77 ✓

Price is the real national figure we collect; value score blends protein-per-dollar (45%), calories-per-dollar (15%) and nutrition quality (40%). Methodology →

More Sandwich matchups

Honey Pepper Pimento Sandwich w/ Chick-fil-A® Filet vs Baja Chicken Protein Pocket
Chick-fil-A vs Subway
Honey Pepper Pimento Sandwich w/ Chick-fil-A® Filet vs Peppercorn Ranch Chicken Protein Pocket
Chick-fil-A vs Subway
Honey Pepper Pimento Sandwich w/ Chick-fil-A® Filet vs Cold Cut Combo® Sandwich (Value) - 6"
Chick-fil-A vs Subway
Honey Pepper Pimento Sandwich w/ Chick-fil-A® Filet vs Roast Turkey Ranch & Bacon Sandwich
Chick-fil-A vs Arby's
Honey Pepper Pimento Sandwich w/ Chick-fil-A® Filet vs Ham & Salami Sandwich (Value) - 6"
Chick-fil-A vs Subway
Honey Pepper Pimento Sandwich w/ Chick-fil-A® Filet vs Personal Cheese Pizza
Chick-fil-A vs Subway

See the full best-value ranking →