Grilled Reuben Melt vs SuperSONIC Double Cheeseburger
Culver's vs Sonic Drive-In · calories, protein, price & value compared
On overall value, Sonic Drive-In SuperSONIC Double Cheeseburger wins — value score 77 vs 70.
For the most protein per dollar, go Sonic Drive-In SuperSONIC Double Cheeseburger (6.2g vs 5.0g per $).
Pure protein: Sonic Drive-In SuperSONIC Double Cheeseburger has more (47g vs 37g).
Lighter option: Culver's Grilled Reuben Melt (660 vs 1,040 cal).
Grilled Reuben Melt
Calories660
Total Fat36 g
Saturated Fat14 g
Sodium1,930 mg
Total Carbs47 g
Fiber4 g
Sugars7 g
Protein37 g
SuperSONIC Double Cheeseburger
Calories1,040
Total Fat70 g
Saturated Fat25 g
Sodium1,600 mg
Total Carbs55 g
Fiber3 g
Sugars11 g
Protein47 g
| Metric | Grilled Reuben Melt | SuperSONIC Double Cheeseburger |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $7.44 ✓ | $7.64 |
| Calories | 660 | 1,040 |
| Protein | 37g | 47g ✓ |
| Carbs | 47g | 55g |
| Fat | 36g | 70g |
| Protein / $ | 5.0g | 6.2g ✓ |
| Calories / $ | 89 | 136 ✓ |
| Protein / 100 cal | 5.6g ✓ | 4.5g |
| Health score | 59 ✓ | 54 |
| Value score | 70 | 77 ✓ |
Price is the real national figure we collect; value score blends protein-per-dollar (45%), calories-per-dollar (15%) and nutrition quality (40%). Methodology →
More Burger matchups
Grilled Reuben Melt vs Double Meat Whataburger
Culver's vs Whataburger
Grilled Reuben Melt vs Whataburger
Culver's vs Whataburger
Grilled Reuben Melt vs Bacon King
Culver's vs Burger King
Grilled Reuben Melt vs Cheeseburger
Culver's vs Burger King
Grilled Reuben Melt vs Whopper
Culver's vs Burger King
Grilled Reuben Melt vs Jr. Cheeseburger
Culver's vs Wendy's