fries.wtf
Home Wingstop Chicken Sandwich

Chicken Sandwich — Wingstop

Other

Nutrition Facts

Calories610
Total Fat24 g
  Saturated Fat5 g
Sodium1,720 mg
Total Carbs66 g
  Fiber2 g
  Sugars10 g
Protein32 g
82Value score (0–100)
$5.79Typical price
5.5gProtein / $
105Calories / $
5.2gProtein / 100 cal

Value score blends protein-per-dollar (45%), calories-per-dollar (15%) and nutrition quality (40%) against every priced item we track. How it’s calculated →

Is the Chicken Sandwich a good deal?

At a typical $5.79, the Chicken Sandwich at Wingstop gives you 610 calories and 32g of protein — 5.5g of protein and 105 calories for every dollar you spend. That earns it a value score of 82/100, which ranks it #101 of the 1012 comparable items we've priced across every chain (the typical comparable item returns about 2.8g of protein per dollar).

Where it stands out: a high absolute protein load (32g). Worth noting, though — sodium runs high (1,720mg). If you want more for your money elsewhere on our value rankings, CYO 1-Top Pizza at Pizza Hut scores higher (89/100 value, $12.29).

Price history

Held steady at $5.79 since Jul 20 (17 daily checks). We re-check this price from Wingstop’s ordering system every day.
Email me if Chicken Sandwich drops in price
Double opt-in · at most one digest a day · unsubscribe in one click.

Higher-value alternatives

CYO 1-Top Pizza
Pizza Hut · 89 value · $12.29 · 9.1g protein/$
CYO 11-Top Pizza
Pizza Hut · 89 value · $12.29 · 9.1g protein/$
CYO 2-Top Pizza
Pizza Hut · 89 value · $12.29 · 9.1g protein/$
CYO 3-Top Pizza
Pizza Hut · 89 value · $12.29 · 9.1g protein/$
CYO 5-Top Pizza
Pizza Hut · 89 value · $12.29 · 9.1g protein/$
Cheese Pizza
Pizza Hut · 89 value · $12.29 · 9.1g protein/$
Create Your Own Pizza
Pizza Hut · 89 value · $12.29 · 9.1g protein/$
Chicken Burrito
Chipotle Mexican Grill · 88 value · $9.15 · 6.3g protein/$

More from Wingstop

Chicken Sandwich Combo5 Boneless Wings3 Boneless Wings75 Boneless Wings50 Boneless Wings30 Boneless Wings
Advertisement

See the full Wingstop value ranking →